Module 5: Enacting Change – Enabling for powerful performance

Topic 5.1: Innovation into Action

Change and innovation are inextricably linked. Any innovation involves change.

Change is ideally designed to innovate a system, process, and/or a service or product, focused on delivering public value. Think of ‘a change’ and ‘an innovation’ as natural partners.

In GSZ633 Managing Outwards in a Networked Government you explored technology as a driver of innovation and change. Some key questions and potential hurdles were raised:

  • Innovations often cross internal and external boundaries.
  • Innovation questions the existing and accepted practices within and between organisations.
  • Technologies are being adopted to link capabilities, to force agencies to become part of networked governments.

In turn, these factors force discussions around spheres of influence, and ownership and control of information.

Globally public entities are committed to, at least in principle, using innovation to reform public services. A question arises however about whether there is also a push for a focus on ‘less risky types of innovation, irrespective of comparative types of need’ (Osborne et all, 2013:157)[1]. Contested services may also bring with them additional issue of balancing risks and benefits.

Revisit the previous discussions about risk. When considering managerial versus citizen risk viewpoints (Eckerd, 2014)[2], managers of innovative projects need to have clear risk management as top of mind.

Required
20 mins

  • Considering innovation, change, and public scrutiny, what is your view of ‘acceptable’ levels of risk when public sector entities engage in innovative practices?
  • What is the appropriate ‘trade-off’ between objective measures of risk and the political view of risk?
  • Think of a recent project in which you have been involved or of which you are aware.
    • How much uncertainty was viewed as ‘acceptable’?
    • How was this level ‘decided’ and shared?
    • Was it in fact explicitly discussed, or was it implied? What was the outcome?
    • What did you learn from this situation and can share?

It is close to being fact that a leader’s beliefs and intentions are key drivers of the degree to which organisations can develop and harness innovation and innovations, and thus change.

Blanket statements about risk and innovation are one thing; how they manifest is another.

There is most likely strong correlation between leaders’ attitudes, and how they want the organisation to approach innovation (Kesting, et all, 2015)[3]. Here are some potential stages or levels of commitment to organisational adoption of innovation and innovative processes.

  • Encouraging innovations and being the first to adopt new approaches.
  • Supporting innovations and actively seeking out new emerging ideas in other places that can be considered.
  • Monitoring new approaches developed in other government agencies or domains, and adopting them when other governments or agencies have tested them.
  • Following other governments in adopting approaches that are proven to be worthwhile or effective.
  • Maintaining current practices and considering change if the organisation is clearly out of touch with prevailing practices or if circumstances require a new approach.
  • Preserving the status quo.

Required
20 mins

As you read these stages and levels of commitment, consider how things ‘are’ in your environment, and their relative impact on teams.

  • At what level do you perceive your organisation adopts innovation?
  • At what level do you believe it ‘should’ adopt innovation?
  • How does this relate to your organisation’s stated policies?

  1. Osborne, S, Radnor, Z & Greta, (2013) A new Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. The American Review of Public Administration, March 2013, Vol 43(2), pp 135-158
  2. Eckerd, A. (2014). Risk management and risk: avoidance in agency decision making., Public Administration Review, 74 (5), pp.616-629.
  3. Kesting, Peter & Ulhøi, John & Song, Jiwen & Niu, Hongyi. (2016). The impact of leadership styles on innovation - a review. Journal of Innovation Management. 3. 22.

License

GSZ634 Managing Operations for Outcomes Copyright © by Queensland University of Technology. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book