Module 1: Strategy and Governance

Topic 1.5 The Importance of Governance and Compliance in the Public Sector

In this section, we examine in more depth the meaning and nature of public sector governance. We do this by discussing various perspectives, and by providing some state, federal and international definitions and actioning approaches around public sector governance, and encourage you to continue to examine these in the light of the critical importance of governance in the public sector.

Required
5 mins

For a set of definitions of Governance, please refer to Appendix 2. The Table will help you to compare and contrast various definitions and principles of governance. By doing so, you will gain insights to a variety of ‘mindsets’ around this important concept.

Public sector governance encompasses:

  • an emphasis on public value and public values;
  • a recognition that government has a special role as a guardian of public value and values;
  • a belief in the role of public sector management as a service to and for the public; and
  • an emphasis on citizenship and democratic collective governance.

Overall, public sector governance might be thought of as the oversight that helps citizens, as a collective, reflect on the expected and actual public value created by policies, programs, projects, and other efforts (Kernaghan, 2003)[1] and that supports the various public undertakings when the value is clear and the cost reasonable (Bryson et al, 2014)[2]. This public value governance is focused on delivering the overall set of outcomes encompassed by public sector value. The role of government agencies has evolved over time. Public sector managers, who once developed objectives (what should be done), guided service delivery (how things should be done), and chose the tools for achieving outcomes, now are part of a network of a community of members from multiple sectors, that includes public-minded public sector managers.

Citizens as participants have become problem-solvers, co-creators and are actively involved in the mindset of governance as well as being voters, clients, customers, and public opinion generators. Various real-time sharing technologies have hugely influenced the way that citizens participate in, and communicate and interact with the various government agencies. Citizens can ‘rate’ just about every aspect their civic lives.

Required
20 mins

Go take a peek at for example the Reviews section of your local public transport agency or department!

The role of public sector policy makers, and managers is nuanced, more ambiguous, and part of a complex system. Government agencies can be a “convenor, catalyst, and collaborator – sometimes steering, sometimes rowing, sometimes partnering, and sometimes staying out of the way”; thus managers and elected participants must create public value so that “what the public most cares about is addressed effectively and what is good for the public is pursued” (Bryson et al, 2014, p. 4).

Increasingly, the imperative is for managers to act within the context of ambiguous policy direction, to consider alternative delivery mechanisms, and to use pragmatic decision criteria. Accountability is multi-faceted – so not only hierarchical and market-driven, but encompassing community values, politics, professional standards and citizens’ interests. So public sector managers must understand public sector value, public values, the public sphere, and overall the importance of how these concepts are articulated, what the expectations are that shape the potential outcomes, and how these are measured, assessed and communicated.

Public value accounting is a mechanism that decides if and when value has been delivered given that government assets have been used; that those assets include government resources and the respective authority to use them; and that the overall sets of costs and benefits have been considered, but including the comprehensive balancing of the welfare of and responsibility to, affected others in the light of a just society (Bryson et al 2014).

Effective agencies focus on achieving good governance. Bryson et al (2014) suggest that some of the principles that are noted as important for the implementation and oversight of public sector governance mechanisms include:

  • Strategy – involves planning and structures, such as strategic and operational planning, organisational structure and having defined and appropriate roles and responsibilities
  • Culture – relates to leadership and integrity, demonstrated in leadership structures and behaviours, executive oversight of strategic decisions, embodiment of leadership principles, conduct and values, employee engagement and commitment to service delivery
  • Relations – refers to communication and reputation, shown in internal and external communication and relationships, striving for a reputation for excellence, working effectively across organisational boundaries
  • Performance – relates to effectiveness and efficiency, through performance monitoring and evaluation systems and process, both at an individual and organisational level, as well as performance reporting
  • Compliance and accountability – this involves meeting statutory and other obligations, through audit, delegation of authority, and having policies, processes and plans to manage finances, risk, human resources, as well as ethical, equal opportunity, occupational health and safety and record keeping obligations.

Required
20 mins

Make an assessment of how your core agency, and your immediate area where you work, score on the 5 factors of governance and compliance factors listed above (1 = Low; 5 = High)

 

Stategy    /5
Culture    /5
Relations    /5
Performance    /5
Compliance and accountability    /5

How do your agency and your immediate work area compare?

  • What does this tell you?
  • Can you find evidence of effective public sector governance in action? What are the implications for you in your role?

Note: This activity may be useful for your Workplace Project.

The following statement from the APSC Building Better Governance publication makes a strong argument for a holistic approach to considering strategy and governance.

Public sector governance covers:
‘…the set of responsibilities and practices, policies and procedures, exercised by an agency’s executive, to provide strategic direction, ensure objectives are achieved, manage risks and use resources responsibly and with accountability.’[3]
It also encompasses the important role of leadership in ensuring that sound governance practices are instilled throughout the organisation and the wider responsibility of all public servants to apply governance practices and procedures in their day-to-day work.

Good governance is about both performance and conformance. Performance relates to how an agency uses governance arrangements to contribute to its overall performance and the delivery of goods, services or programmes. Conformance relates to how an agency uses governance arrangements to ensure it meets the requirements of the law, regulations, published standards and community expectations of probity, accountability and openness.

This means that, on a daily basis, governance is typically about the way public servants take decisions and implement policies. A healthy evaluation environment also uses ‘audit’ processes and outcomes to support and enhance organisational governance.


Conclusion

In Module 1, we have encouraged you to appraise the role of strategy in delivering public value, and of the importance of governance in the public.

As we move into the next module, keep in mind the importance of value in the public sector context, and continue to reflect on the direction and action tools – strategy and a business model.

To deliver on desired outcomes, organisations must identify, muster and enable the various resources necessary. It must also have a clear understanding of the environment in which it operates. Hence, in Module 2 we first build a template of the strategy journey, we explore a set of tools that enable a comprehensive picture of the organisation’s environment, and we suggest a means by which the organisation can attempt to match its capabilities to that environment.

Required

Working towards your Workplace Project

Revisit the various pieces of analysis you have conducted. Consider your learning insights to date.

Now consider your Workplace Project Proposal.

Develop an overall approach to appraising, from an overall business model and strategy viewpoint, how you would ‘evaluate’ and thus justify your Workplace Project Proposal.

  • What is the ‘value proposition’ that the initiative is intended to deliver?
  • To what degree does your preliminary analysis using the Public Value Dimensions diagnostic support your project?
  • How does your project stack up using the Public Value Scorecard?

Now move to a ‘helicopter’ view.

Begin to fill in the various components of the business model canvas in relation to your Workplace Project. A blank business model canvas is available from the Workplace Project Resources in your Unit Site.

  • Use the following adapted ‘strategic triangle’ questions to begin to answer the big questions.
  • What is the ‘public value’ the organisation is seeking to produce?
  • What are the sources of legitimacy and support that can ‘authorise’ the organisation to take action and provide resources to sustain the effort to create that value?

 


  1. Kernaghan, K. (2003). Integrating Values into Public Service: The Values Statement as Centerpiece. Public Administration Review, 63(6), 711–719.
  2. Bryson, J., Crosby, B. & Bloomsberg, L. (2014). Administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 439-549. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12238
  3. Australian Government, Australian Public Service Commission. (2007). Building better governance. Retrieved from https://www.apsc.gov.au/building-better-governance

License

GSZ634 Managing Operations for Outcomes Copyright © by Queensland University of Technology. All Rights Reserved.

Share This Book