Topic 4.1: Trust
Trust is a word that engenders a lot of responses in human social systems. Personally, when you hear the word ‘trust’, do you think of an organisation, a brand or a person? For some people, it is almost easier to think of those organisations, brands or people that they may not trust.
Much of the literature in relation to trust suggests that it is fundamental to building strong team and stakeholder relationships. In the absence of trust, we will be guarded in our dealings with others and may not achieve the success that we need in working with others.
“Trust is the conduit for influence. It is the connection through which ideas travel.” Professor Amy Cuddy[1]
In a famous article in Harvard Business Review several years ago, Professor Amy Cuddy and her team explored the critical importance of trust as a platform for human connection. The central idea being that if I don’t trust you or your intent, I am less likely to be influenced by your message – even if you are seen as an ‘expert’ or leader in your field. The advice from the research underpinning their work suggests that ‘warmth before competence’ is critical in establishing positive personal and professional relationships.
Required Reflection
30 min
After reading the above article, reflect on the following questions.
- What do you think of the idea that ‘before people decide what they think of your message they decide what they think of you’?
- Are there times in your management and leadership role where you have struggled to build trusting connections?
- What could you do more deliberately in establishing trust within your team?
15 min
Neuroeconomist Dr Paul Zak believes that the hormone oxytocin (he calls it “the moral molecule”) is responsible for trust, empathy and other feelings that help build a stable society and engender pro-social behaviour.
Watch his TED talk where he explores his ideas and their implications for managers and leaders.
Recommended Video
5 mins
- Cuddy, J. C., Kohut, M., & Neffinger, J. (2013). Connect, then lead. Harvard Business Review, 91(7-8), 54–132. ↵